![]() Surgeons could add this alternative surgical maneuver to their armamentarium during the primary palatoplasty, in which coverage of lateral surfaces and reinforcement with fat tissue in the anterior soft palate space are of paramount relevance. Of 19 patients (33.9 percent) who underwent auditory-perceptual assessment, 15 (78.9 percent) had normal resonance. Consecutive nonsyndromic patients ( n = 56) with cleft palate were treated with this method, all of whom demonstrated fast mucosalization of lateral palatal recipient regions within 3 weeks postoperatively and showed no fistula with 12 months’ follow-up. This technique introduces buccal fat tissue for coverage of lateral denuded palate surfaces to reduce the bone exposure and scar formation to potentially attenuate maxillary growth interference and for reinforcement of the palatal areas of high tension or with incomplete closure to decrease the risk of postoperative dehiscence and oronasal fistula formation. This retrospective study describes the surgical technique and early results of a technical innovation utilizing the split buccal fat flaps in modified Furlow palatoplasty with small double-opposing Z-plasty. The optimal solution: use a variable resistor mini-potentiometer for each pickup to be split, so you can dial in to preference the split sound based on the three variables above (height, position/location, design).Encouraging results have been described for the use of pedicled buccal fat pad flap in primary cleft palate repair. It's a matter of tuning the resistor to the pickup design, location/position on the body and height, which brings us toģ. So the higher the resistor, the more of the grounded coil gets retained in the signal, higher output, less hum, but also less bright. Different pickups will prefer different resistor values, so your results in retaining the original resistors will be hit or miss. If you retain the resistors, you should be able to swap out pickups and retain the benefits of the "partial split." That said,Ģ. This technique introduces buccal fat tissue for coverage of lateral denuded palate surfaces to reduce the bone exposure and scar formation. I don't think anyone answered this, so here goes:ġ. This retrospective study describes the surgical technique and early results of a technical innovation utilizing the split buccal fat flaps in modified Furlow palatoplasty with small double-opposing Z-plasty. If I can ever justify a 3rd electric, that will probably be it! But I think the knob could be really useful when used with the treble tone knob to achieve a wide range of tones. Some people also do this circuit with a fixed bass cut switch vs a passive bass tone knob. I really like the sound of de-bassed humbuckers but haven't had a chance to compare. I think my ideal hollowbody would be something like a PRS SE Hollowbody II with a 3 knob passive VTB circuit and 85/15 or 58/15 pickups. International Leading Multi-Sector Recruiter As a worldwide leading expert in professional recruitment services, at PRS Jobs we know that finding the right. If anyone has read this far, I wonder how you like a bass cut circuit compared to the "optimized resistor-tuned coil split." For example, why/why not make reverb footswitchable? It all implies certain usage parameters and intentions, which are helpful to know about. It would be incredibly fascinating and useful. Every guitar, for example, I think, should have at least a QR code linking to a site with a PDF that has a thorough designer's brief on every feature and appointment, explaining why they made it the way they did. ![]() To be fair, however, I also find documentation on this stuff to be lacking. How many times does this happen to poorly-understood consumer technologies? I regularly read negative Amazon reviews, for example, where it is obvious the reviewer has NO idea how to correctly use the device they are complaining about. So adding yet another "adjustment parameter" on top of that might be poorly received, especially if something gets put out of adjustment, the guitar could be accused of being defective and subjected to a labor-intensive diagnostic process, or worse yet, perceived as a bad guitar. Not to mention that most guitarists these days don't seem to appreciate or know how to use their volume and tone knobs (all this talk about pickup "output balancing" ignores the fact that you can dial in your rig for your weakest tone, eg coil split or a strat's #2/#4 positions, eg with volume up and tone backed off, and then also sound great when you switch to your stronger sounds, with additional "boost" and "bright" on tap as needed), let alone how to (or that you can and even should) fine-tune pickup height and string balance. Another electrical connection, another mechanical point of failure, and perhaps additional pennies in parts and minutes of labor per instrument. I am surprised that more manufacturers don't do this, although I suppose I can see why. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |